剑12写作8分范文及解析 | Test5 各领域的信息共享

双边类大作文，科技类话题

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

题目来源：剑12Test5大作文

1、题目大意

一些人认为，在科学研究、商业和学术界尽可能多地分享信息是好事。其他人认为，有些信息太重要或太宝贵，无法自由分享。讨论这两种观点并给出自己的看法。

2、思路解析

这是一道双边类大作文，讨论的是信息是否应该共享的问题。双边类大作文，需要对每个观点分别表达同意或反对，最终的结论就是我的立场，可以是中立（双方都同意或都反对），也可以是单边支持某一方立场。审题时注意两点，一是题目讨论范围“scientific research, business and the academic world”，在论证时需要提及相关内容。二是观点中“as much as possible”和“freely”两种表述，需要进行讨论。下面，王珍老师带大家一起看下具体观点。

首先来看前者的观点的合理性，可以有三方面。

一是能够促进知识和科学的进步。当研究成果被公开发布时，其他科学家和学者可以在此基础上进行进一步的研究，避免重复劳动。这种协作可以推动科学技术的整体发展，加速创新的步伐。例如，开源软件的共享使全球的开发者能够共同改进软件功能，提高技术水平，从而促进整个行业的进步。

二是增加透明度和信任。在科学和商业领域，信息的透明度有助于建立信任。公开研究方法和数据可以使结果更具可信度，减少误导和欺诈的可能性。例如，企业公开其供应链信息，可以增强消费者对其产品的信心。

三是有利于社会整体利益。信息的自由共享可以带来社会福利的最大化。例如，在医疗领域，分享研究数据和临床试验结果可以加速新药的开发和治疗方法的改进，拯救更多生命。教育资源的开放共享可以让更多的人获得高质量的教育机会，缩小贫富差距，促进社会公平。

再来看不应自由分享的观点，同样有三个方面。

一是应当保护知识产权和投资回报。研发和创机构常需要大量的时间、资金和人力投入。若信息被自由共享，可能会导致原创者无法获得应有的经济回报，打击创新的积极性。知识产权保护能够确保发明者和创作者享有其成果的专有权利，从而激励持续的创新和投资。例如，制药公司需要专利保护来收回新药研发的高昂成本。

二是部分研究涉及国家安全的问题。某些信息如果被不当的人获取，可能会威胁国家安全和公共安全。例如，军事技术、网络安全漏洞和情报信息等需要严格保密。自由分享此类信息可能会被恐怖组织或敌对势力利用，造成严重的安全隐患。

三是维持商业竞争优势。在商业领域，企业的核心技术、商业策略和客户数据是其竞争优势的关键。如果这些信息被公开，竞争对手可能会利用这些信息夺取市场份额，削弱原企业的竞争力，不利于行业的健康发展。因此，企业有必要对关键信息进行保密，以保护自身利益。

3、提纲

剑12写作8分范文及解析 | Test5 各领域的信息共享

4、高分范文示例

People have different views about whether information sharing in the areas of scientific research, business and academics should be maximised. While such information sharing can sometimes be beneficial, I believe there should be a boundary for sharing.

On the one hand, information sharing maximisation among these three sectors could achieve the purpose of mutual benefits. Firstly, the field of scientific research could provide diverse perspectives for researchers, which contributes to a comprehensive analysis of the scientific phenomenon. Secondly, in the area of business, information sharing could improve customer loyalty because it creates a relatively transparent environment between companies and customers. For example, in the food industry, if information about the ingredients and the productive process is provided, it could enhance the brand credibility which attracts customers. Finally, in terms of academics, information sharing could generate creative theories. It provides scholars various angles of existing theses which enables them to develop.

On the other hand, unrestricted information sharing could lead to severe negative consequences. To begin with, free access to scientific research may penetrate national security because the sensitive information could be taken advantage of. If the government research on weaponry technologies could be viewed freely, it may draw attention from terrorist groups which would cause a disaster. After that, for the business world, such information sharing could lead to vicious competition. Take the food industry as an example, others may detect the core recipe and duplicate the product. With regard to the academic field, if the information is accessible, intellectual property may not be recognised. In this respect, plagiarism emerges where there is no respect for original scholars. It can therefore be argued there should be a boundary for sharing information. Some sensitive and valuable information may need to be kept strictly confidential.

In conclusion, I can understand why people might want open information in the areas of scientific research, business and academics, but it seems to me that certain information with a sensitive and valuable nature cannot be accessed liberally.

5、相关词汇和语法结构

Information sharing 信息共享

Scientific research 科学研究

Mutual benefits 互惠互利

Comprehensive analysis 全面分析

Brand credibility 品牌信誉

Productive process 生产过程

Transparent environment 透明的环境

Creative theories 创新理论

Sensitive information 敏感信息

National security 国家安全

Weaponry technologies 武器技术