本次考试口语和独立写作各有3套题目。篇幅限制，今天只展示第一套题目及名师解析。
托福口语
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
It is disrespectful for tourists to take photos of strangers without their permission.
火箭托福教研组名师解析
🚀
写作思路
✨隐私权问题：陌生人可能不希望自己的形象被拍摄并传播，尤其是在网络时代，未经许可的照片可能被滥用。
✨文化与道德尊重：在某些国家和地区，未经许可拍照被认为是不礼貌甚至是禁忌的。
参考答案
I strongly agree that taking photos of strangers without permission is disrespectful.
First, it violates privacy, as many people don’t want their images shared without consent, especially in the digital age. For example, in some cultures, photographing certain individuals, like women or children, can be seen as offensive. Second, it’s a matter of cultural respect.
In some regions, capturing someone’s photo without permission is considered highly inappropriate.Therefore, a better approach is to simply ask before taking a picture. This way, tourists can be respectful while still capturing meaningful memories.
托福写作
👨🏫教授：Should short-distance flights be banned?
👩🎓学生A：yes, since they produce pollution
🧑🎓学生B：no, since people may need them
解析
👩🎓学生A的立场：支持禁止短途航班
论据1：短途航班的碳排放效率低下。
短途航班的单位距离碳排放量远高于长途航班，因为飞机在起飞和降落阶段消耗的燃料比例较高。相比之下，高铁或电动巴士等替代交通工具的碳排放量更低，且更适合短距离旅行。
例句：Short-distance flights produce significantly more carbon emissions per passenger-kilometer compared to trains or buses. For instance, a flight from Paris to Lyon emits about 100 kg of CO₂ per passenger, while a high-speed train emits less than 10 kg.
论据2：短途航班阻碍了绿色交通的发展。
短途航班的存在减少了人们对更环保交通工具的需求，从而延缓了绿色交通技术的普及。如果禁止短途航班，政府和企业将更倾向于投资高铁、电动巴士等低碳交通方式，加速全球脱碳进程。
例句：Banning short-distance flights would push governments and companies to invest in greener alternatives like high-speed rail and electric buses, which are more sustainable for the environment.
🧑🎓学生B的立场：反对禁止短途航班，因为人们可能需要它们
论据1：短途航班满足时间效率的需求。
对于商务旅行者或紧急情况，短途航班提供了更快捷的出行方式。虽然高铁或巴士可能更环保，但它们无法提供与飞机相同的时间效率，尤其是在城市间距离较远的情况下。
例句：For business travelers, short-distance flights save time compared to trains or buses. A flight from New York to Boston takes about 1 hour, while a train journey can take up to 4 hours.
论据2：短途航班对偏远地区至关重要。
在一些偏远地区，短途航班可能是唯一的交通方式，尤其是对于岛屿或山区的居民。禁止短途航班将对这些地区的经济和居民生活造成严重影响。
例句：Short-distance flights are vital for remote areas like Alaska or the Caribbean islands, where alternatives like trains or buses are unavailable. Banning them would isolate communities and harm local economies.
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
