做慈善这个话题在雅思写作里还蛮高频的（aka比较重要的考点哦）而且争论的焦点，也是围绕“慈善自己人?泛滥的爱” 甚至很多考国际援助的题目，也是问：国际援助有没有国界？比如这一道：
So，例文不仅适用于慈善这个题，国际援助也可以借鉴（建议积累）。
例文：Some people believe that charities should help people in need no matter where those people are in the world. Others feel that these organizations should only serve the people living in the country where they are based.Discuss both sides and give your own view.
有些人认为，慈善机构应该帮助需要帮助的人，无论这些人在世界上的哪个地方。另一些人则认为，这些组织应该只服务于所在国的人民。
开头段：The distribution of charity is often a matter of controversy. Many claim that the money is required to cover expenditure at home. However, opponents think it is immoral to deprive poor and needy people of necessary financial support. This essay will consider both opinions and conclude that charity should be shared among all deserving causes.
慈善的分配常常是一个有争议的问题。许多人声称这笔钱是用来支付家庭开支的。然而，反对者认为剥夺穷人和有需要的人必要的经济支持是不道德的。本文将分析这两种观点，并认为慈善应该在所有值得的事业中分享。
BODY 1：There are several arguments in favour of keeping charitable donations inside one’s own country. First of all, each nation reserves the right to determine its contribution in thelight of changing circumstances. The UK government,for example,has decided to cut its overseas aid budget this year, mainly due to the economic impact of Covid 19. If this action had not been taken, they may not have had enough resources to tackle domestic problems. Secondly, individual nations have responsibilities to their own citizens. When national economies are badly affected by disasters such as the Covid pandemic, governments often have littlenochoice but to give priority to their own people, otherwise they would face harsh criticism.
赞成将慈善捐款保留在本国境内的观点有几种。首先，每个国家保留根据变化的情况决定其贡献的权利。例如，英国政府决定削减今年的海外援助预算，主要原因是新冠肺炎对经济的影响。如果不采取这一行动，他们可能就没有足够的资源来解决国内问题。其次，每个国家都对自己的公民负有责任。当国家经济受到新冠疫情等灾难的严重影响时，政府往往别无选择，只能优先考虑本国人民，否则将面临严厉的批评。
BODY 2：On the other hand, some people disagree with this. There will always be countries whose needs are far greater than our own, for instance, countries like Syria that are at war, or those suffering from natural calamities such as earthquakes or tsunamis. Provided that all aid is carefully managed to ensure that it reaches the people who need it, the long-term benefits of supporting poorer countries will be felt across the world. Besides, richer countries can easily afford to donate money to international causes without suffering significantly, and if countries can be helped out of poverty, there is less chance of them being vulnerable to disease and war. Eradicating these destructive elements means a safer and happier world for all.
有些人不同意这一点。总有一些国家的需求要大得多，比如叙利亚这样正在打仗的国家，或者遭受地震海啸等自然灾害的国家。只要所有援助都被仔细管理，以确保它们到达需要的人手中，那么全世界都能感受到支持较贫穷国家的长期好处。此外，富裕的国家可以很容易地向国际事业捐款，也不会遭受重大损失，如果可以帮助这些国家摆脱贫困，他们遭受疾病和战争的可能性就会降低。消除这些破坏性因素意味着为所有人创造更安全和更幸福的世界。
CONCLUSION：In conclusion, I would argue that charities should not discriminate on the basis of nationality. The purpose of charity organizationis to help people overcome difficulties. To some extent, in this era of globalization, helping people in other countries is essentially helping one’s own country, because the world is so closely interconnected. Famous charity figures such as Mocather Teresa never cared about the nationality of the people they saved, and their stories have been inspiring the whole human race to be stronger and more united.
总之，我认为慈善机构不应该以国籍为基础进行歧视。慈善组织的宗旨是帮助人们克服困难。在某种程度上，在这个全球化的时代，帮助其他国家的人本质上就是帮助自己的国家，因为世界是如此紧密相连。像特蕾莎修女这样的著名慈善人士从不关心他们拯救的人的国籍，他们的故事激励着整个人类变得更加强大和团结。
【竞赛报名/项目咨询请加微信：mollywei007】
