观点类大作文,交通类话题
Some people think more public money should be spent on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目来源:2023年8月19日大陆雅思大作文
1、题目大意
有些人认为应该把更多的公共资金花在道路和高速公路上,而不是公共交通系统上。多大程度上同意或不同意?
2、思路解析
这是一道观点类大作文,聊的是道路建设vs公共交通建设,审题时注意两点,一是题目中包含了比较关系,即投资道路建设vs投资公共交通建设,在论证中需要对双方优劣进行比较;二是题目明确了public money,因此需要考虑到这个费用来源的特性。下面,月半鸭和大家一起来看下具体观点。
首先来看更多投资道路建设的观点,有两方面。
一方面道路建设能够提高交通效率并促进经济发展。道路和高速公路是不同地区之间的主要联系方式,投资于它们可以提高交通流量,使物流和人流的移动更为高效。同时,好的道路网络能够连接生产地和消费地,增加商业机会,从而带来更多的税收和就业机会,促进经济发展。
另一方面道路和高速公路为私家车提供了方便。特别是那些人口密度较低的地区,公共交通需求较低甚至是难以抵达,而私家车提供了更高的出行灵活性。
其次来看反对角度的观点,同样有三方面
一是是减少环境污染,公共交通,特别是电气化的公共交通,产生的废气更少。能够有效减少环境污染问题,为居民创造一个更好的居住环境。
二是是道路拥堵问题,道路建设可能会带来私家车数量骤增,而发展公共交通可以人们对于私家车的依赖,进而减少城市中的车辆数量,达到缓解交通拥堵的目的。
最后发展公共交通更能体现社会公平性,用于建设公共资金可能来源于每一个公民,但是其中多数人可能并没有私家车,因此发展公共交通能够惠及更多有出行需求的居民。
3、提纲
4、高分范文示例
The distribution of public capital remains a point of significant controversy, frequently serving as a litmus test for the divergent priorities within a society. A faction persists in championing the redirection of increased resources towards the development of roads and highways, maintaining that these represent the vital conduits of a nation's economy. While this perspective merits consideration, I find myself in partial dissent, contending that judicious investment in both thoroughfares and public transit systems is indispensable to societal prosperity.
There is no gainsaying the pivotal role that roads and highways perform in fostering a country's economic advancement. These infrastructural components expedite the transit of merchandise and services, thereby catalyzing the efficient functioning of enterprises. Moreover, in regions less frequented by public transit—predominantly rural landscapes—roadways serve as indispensable lifelines, facilitating access to fundamental amenities for local communities.
Nevertheless, an excessive focus on road infrastructure could inadvertently precipitate undesirable repercussions. Foremost among these is the potential to stimulate an upsurge in the utilization of private transportation, thereby intensifying the quandary of traffic congestion in metropolitan areas. The environmental ramifications are equally grave, given that private conveyances tend to emit a higher ratio of greenhouse gases per passenger mile compared to their public counterparts.
Conversely, prudent investment in public transit infrastructures can yield a plethora of benefits. Enhanced public transportation systems can diminish our dependency on private vehicles, thereby mitigating congestion and attenuating environmental contamination. Furthermore, such systems can engender social equity by offering affordable mobility alternatives for all citizens, especially those for whom private vehicle ownership remains an unattainable luxury.
In summation, whilst roads and highways indisputably constitute a crucial segment of a country's infrastructural fabric, it is critical not to marginalize the significance of public transit systems. A balanced apportionment of public resources, thoughtfully addressing both these facets, would underpin a sustainable and equitable transportation matrix.
5、相关词汇和语法结构
Point of significant controversy 有争议的重要问题
Litmus test 试金石
Divergent priorities 差异化的优先事项
Merits consideration 值得考虑
Judicious investment 明智的投资
No gainsaying 无可否认
Pivotal role 关键角色
Expedite the transit 加速过渡
Efficient functioning of enterprises 企业的高效运作
Indispensable lifelines 不可或缺的生命线
Undesirable repercussions 不良反响
Quandary of traffic congestion 交通拥堵的困境
Environmental ramifications 环境影响
Plethora of benefits 众多好处
Diminish our dependency 减少我们的依赖
Engender social equity 产生社会公平
Affordable mobility alternatives 负担得起的出行选择
Balanced apportionment 平衡分配