2025年NHSDLC春季PF辩题投票正式开启！

2025春季常规赛PF辩题投票将于今日正式开启！

本次辩题最终将落在法律、政治、国际关系、科技及经济政策五大领域内，本次的候选辩题涉猎广泛，也非常符合大家对于辩题领域的期待，相信明年春天我们也能在思辨之旅中收获良多！

下面来具体了解本次的候选辩题吧～

#1

法律

Law

Resolved: The United States should enforce antitrust laws against tech giants.

美国应针对科技巨头执行反垄断法。

Antitrust topics revolve around questions of dominance and control of technological sectors. Have FAANG companies (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google) become too big? Do they control so much of their markets that they constitute a monopoly? Antitrust topics revolve around these questions of dominance and control of technological sectors. Pro teams must demonstrate that antitrust laws are not only necessary, but also an effective solution. Con teams could argue that FAANG companies face growing competition, or that breaking companies apart create more problems than benefits.

#2

政治

Politics

Resolved: Governments should implement a Universal Basic Income.

各国政府应实施全民基本收入政策。

Many countries face a similar problem of rising unemployment. In addition, the threat of Artificial Intelligence replacing workers compounds the problem. Consequently, calls for a Universal Basic Income that unconditionally guarantees a livable wage to everyone, regardless of their employment status, have grown exponentially. Should governments provide living wages to everyone, even if they do not work? Would UBI programs take away money from existing welfare programs and result in a net decrease in support for the poor?

#3

国际关系

International Relations

Resolved: Military intervention by the African Union does more good than harm.

非洲联盟的军事干预利大于弊。

Pro and con teams will clash over the necessity and consequences of military intervention in Africa. Under what conditions should the African Union militarily intervene in the affairs of a member state? Is genocide the only case where intervention would be a just solution? Is military intervention an appropriate or effective response to urgent humanitarian issues?

#4

科技

Technology

Resolved:Expanding access to human gene editing technologies is more beneficial than harmful.

增加人类基因编辑技术的应用利大于弊。

Should humans have access to gene editing technologies that could alter DNA to prevent certain traits? Would gene editing be limited to only lifesaving or life-improving medical cases? Could individuals and/or governments use gene editing to promote ideal racial, ethic, or beauty standards? Pro and con teams must weigh the impacts associated with human gene editing technologies.

#5

经济政策

Economic Policy

Resolved: International financial institutions should prioritize debt cancellation over new loans to developing nations.

国际金融组织针对发展中国家应该优先考虑取消债务，而不是提供新的贷款

International financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank currently prioritize promotion of loans, often on the conditions of structural adjustment policies in recipient nations. Pro teams would instead defend cancellation, not relief, of debt. Con teams could argue about the economic costs associated with cancellation, or the harmful ways that countries would spend their newfound budgets.