针对考试去积累语料的话，坦白讲其实积累来积累去就这么几个，而且语料也不会像食物那样过期。
下面这篇是前一年写的关于科技的语料，
考试类写作基本款表达积累
当然现在也是完全可以用的。
只是因为类似科技确实不断有在发展，所以时不时阅读的时候会遇到相关内容，下面是一个最近关于ChatGPT 在学校的讨论
本身作者讨论的是学校里面要不要禁止使用ChatGPT 的话题，但是核心和要不要禁止任何科技设备都是一样的，所以很多的内容在我们相关的考试话题里面都是可以用的。
作者的观点是不应该禁止：
有一个理由是学生在现实生活中也是要面对ChatGPT的，引导学生去合理的利用这个工具才是学校和老师应该做的。
具体的语料
That’s the biggest reason not to ban it from the classroom, in fact — because today’s students will graduate into a world full of generative A.I. programs. They’ll need to know their way around these tools — their strengths and weaknesses, their hallmarks and blind spots — in order to work alongside them. To be good citizens, they’ll need hands-on experience to understand how this type of A.I. works, what types of bias it contains, and how it can be misused and weaponized.
This adjustment won’t be easy. Sudden technological shifts rarely are. But who better to guide students into this strange new world than their teachers?
另外一个理由是：学校想禁止其实也禁止不了，而且会让老师和学生的关系对立起来，对于学习不好。
具体的语料
Sure, a school can block the ChatGPT website on school networks and school-owned devices. But students have phones, laptops and any number of other ways of accessing it outside of class. (Just for kicks, I asked ChatGPT how a student who was intent on using the app might evade a schoolwide ban. It came up with five answers, all totally plausible, including using a VPN to disguise the student’s web traffic.)
...
“I don’t want to be in an adversarial relationship with my students,” said Gina Parnaby, the chair of the English department at the Marist School, an independent school for grades seven through 12 outside Atlanta. “If our mind-set approaching this is that we have to build a better mousetrap to catch kids cheating, I just think that’s the wrong approach, because the kids are going to figure something out.”
两点是不是适合所有讨论学校或者家里使用科技设备的话题。
觉得有用，就积累下啊。
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
