综合写作回忆
独立写作分析
独立写作题目回忆：
Your professor is teaching a class on sociology. Write a post responding to the professor's question.
In your response, you should do the following.
Express and support your opinion.
Make a contribution to the discussion in your own words.
An effective response will contain at least 100 words.
Doctor This week, we’ll be discussing ways to address air pollution. One idea is introducing environmental taxes on air travel. Such taxes also referred to as ecological taxes or green taxes, are extra charges that get added to the price of airplane tickets. Money collected from these taxes could be invested in environmentally friendly technologies or in promoting other cleaner modes of transportation. Do you think there should be an environmental tax on air travel? Why or why not? AndrewWe should impose environmental taxes on air travel. These taxes might encourage people to find cheaper, more eco-friendly ways to get places. In my country, many people use planes to fly a short distance because flights are relatively cheap, when they could just as easily take a less polluting form of transportation.Claire: Additional taxes on air travel will do little to solve the problem of air pollution. Airplane tickets would become more expensive, punishing passengers without incentivizing airlines to become more environmentally friendly. The airlines should pay the price to protect the environment, not their customers
考情分析
因为8月托福大陆考试还未开始，所以老师特意收集了一些全球其他地区考场的写作题目，分析给大家。也欢迎在全球其他地方考试的同学回忆题目给我，我会第一时间分析考题给大家。
今天要分析的是7月30日亚太考场的题目。 这道题目重复了今年4.12日考过的原题。 也是改革后写作团day18重点讲解过的题目。算是又命中了一次考题。
? 4.12日托福写作考情分析| 应不应该征收航空税？
Airplanes release a lot of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, polluting the air and contributing to climate change. To address this problem, some countries have introduced an additional tax on air travel called an ecological tax — an extra charge added to the price of an airplane ticket. Money collected from this ecological tax will be invested in less polluting modes of transportation, such as trains, which passengers are encouraged to use instead of airplanes. Do you agree or disagree that there should be an ecological tax on air travel? Why?
所以老师再次强调， 改革后的考题和之前的考题有很大的相同。尤其是上半年考过的新题，题目很长的，大家一定要关注！
审题注意点
1.是否要给飞机征税。 目的是为了减少空气污染。可以分析的是，给飞机征税的好坏结果，和是否真的能达到减少空气污染的目的。
2. 可行的思路：
--①飞机征税，增加人们负担，所以人们会选择做火车，减少直接排向空气的污染。
???：这个思路稍难，需要一点语料和背景常识。
--②" Money collected from these taxes could be invested in environmentally friendly technologies or in promoting other cleaner modes of transportation."， 比如：高铁确实很方便，排污少，也满足了人们出行的需求。值得政府去投资。
???：问题是高铁如何写？答案是：high-speed rail
不同意：
--①飞机征税并不会给很多人减少人们坐飞机，因为也不会减少空气污染。因为坐飞机的主要人群是中产阶级和富豪。征税，并不会给他们增加明显的负担。就像即便是私人飞机出行价格不菲，但是仍然有很多富人乐此不疲。反而伤害了普通民众。(比如之前卡戴珊家族的Kelly，因仅17分钟私人飞机出行被媒体炮轰)
--②飞机征税会给普通民众和国家都带来经济负担。飞机因为快捷，方便，成为很多普通民众旅游的选择。如果征税，就会加重这些人的经济负担。其次，也会影响相关旅游业的发展。
???：相同而言，不同意的思路比较生活化，大家都有语料，反而好写一些。
参考范文:
参考范文一：I agree with Andrew that imposing green taxes on air travel is wise for governments. This can effectively curb the air pollution caused by airplane emissions. As we know, airplanes not only emit tons of toxic gases, known as the culprits of global warming, but also discharge them directly into the upper atmosphere. There's no wind to blow those harmful gases away or rain to wash them off in the upper atmosphere, thus air travel causes more serious harm to the atmosphere than other modes of transportation like trains or buses. By imposing higher taxes on air travel and raising the price of air tickets, governments can encourage more responsible choices. In Sweden, for instance, the introduction of an aviation tax led to a decrease in air travel and an increase in train usage. Many would think twice before purchasing tickets, as no one likes those high prices coming from their wallets. With fewer people choosing air travel, the pollution it causes will diminish correspondingly. In conclusion, governments should enact this policy, as demonstrated by successful examples, to help alleviate the pollution caused by airplanes.（185字）
参考范文二：
I am inclined to agree with Claire's perspective that environmental taxes on air travel will not significantly curb air pollution. This is because that the primary patrons of air travel are the wealthy upper class, such as billionaires and corporate executives, who frequently travel for international business meetings, high-profile events, and luxury vacations. Some even own private jets to avoid traffic during rush hours; for example, a billionaire might use a private jet to attend a business meeting in another city on the same day. They typically wouldn't mind paying extra dollars for the comfort and speed offered by air travel. Consequently, this large group of people, unaffected by the policy, will not reduce airplane emissions. As for those less affluent, such as middle-class families who may save for months to afford an air ticket to a holiday destination like Bali or Hawaii, they are sure to suffer from the policy. However, the emissions caused by these annual family vacation only constitute too small a proportion to make a substantial difference. In conclusion, I believe governments should not impose such a policy to curb air pollution. (185字)
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
